![]() |
How to Get Reads: A Social Experiment |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 9> |
Author | |
nod1v1ng ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Jul 2016 Location: ChillybytheSea Status: Offline Points: 11124 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 30 Jan 2023 at 8:05am |
Hello lovelies - While we are awaiting confirmations to come tomorrow, I thought I would confess something. I've been conducting a social experiment on the forums and I thought I'd share the results with you. Often we hear people say - it's hard for newbies to get reads or you have to be a "cool kid" in order to get a lot of reads. Then, inevitably, an old schooler will reply with you have to give reads to get reads. I've been around a while, so I decided to design a social experiment to find out what it looks like to try and get reads as the proverbial new kid. Over several comps, I signed up a couple of new forum users to see what would happen. Overall, only a small handful of users read my story first, and 100% of those were new users. 75% of those were groupmates coming by to size up the competition. So, essentially, waiting around to get reads is not very productive--as an unknown you just aren't going to get a lot of unsolicited reads. This probably isn't surprising, because it is natural for people to remember users who they've enjoyed reading in the past and seek them out over reading a random unknown. Trying to get return reads seemed the way to go, so I set out to read 100 stories, equally split between other new users and people who have been around a long time. The overall return read rate across all 100 stories was only 53%. However, returns by forum users who have been around a while were at 69%, while newer users only return read at 37%. The most likely users to return read were folks who have been around a while AND have a high level of points. Points--for those who do not know--simply correspond to how many posts and comments a user makes, so it is unsurprising that the individuals who are most likely to return read are people who are most active on the forums. It seems that those who have been around longer, more fully subscribe to the general etiquette of if someone reads you, you return the favor. Although, hopefully this experiment will encourage more new folks to return reads! Anecdotally: Something I did notice, particularly of old schoolers, is that there's a general air that new forum users equate to new writers. My "newbie" forum handles were often treated as if they were novice writers, to the point where in a few instances it became a bit condescending. I gave the same reviews I would give as nod, but sometimes got a response like - and who are you to give me constructive crit? The return reviews were sometimes in the same vein - even compliments were somewhat patronizing. Wow, what a good job for a new writer. Pat. Pat. It's worthwhile to remember that you have no idea who the person is behind the forum handle. A new user could still be a well published, award winning author. They could be a professional editor or a MFA Professor. There is absolutely no correlation between how long someone has participated in the forums and their experience with writing. TL;DR:
Experiment complete! Take it as you will. Edited by nod1v1ng - 30 Jan 2023 at 8:51am |
|
![]() |
|
Monsieur Renard ![]() NYC Midnight Regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 Feb 2017 Status: Offline Points: 343 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very interesting read, thanks for going into it. I personally make an effort to return all feedback I'm given. I've never strategically thought about who I want to leave feedback for, I just read and feed back on the ones I feel like I want to read.
I *feel* like the reciprocation rate I get back is is higher than what you describe in your experiment, but I've never measured it so don't really know. Did you notice any drop off in reciprocation over time? I'm imagining people might start struggling with a backlog after a while.
Edited by Monsieur Renard - 30 Jan 2023 at 8:19am |
|
R1 G30: Bottle Ache
|
|
![]() |
|
fioOxf ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 Jul 2018 Location: Oxford, UK Status: Offline Points: 5366 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I try to return all reads. On the odd occasion - like this round of rhyming - I get behind, because life... - but it'll probably end up as a race on Tuesday night, because I do feel that if other bothered to not just read but comment, I owe it to them. With Short Story, I'll have a bit more time for reading, and will alternate newbies with oldies - that's my usual strategy. But if I notice someone consistently doesn't return reads, I remember...
![]() Edited by fioOxf - 30 Jan 2023 at 5:45pm |
|
![]() |
|
nod1v1ng ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Jul 2016 Location: ChillybytheSea Status: Offline Points: 11124 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Historically, there is a drop off in forum activity over time, particularly when a new comp/round begins. So, I specifically did my reads in the first week & a half (and spread them over multiple contests and rounds) in order to avoid the drop off rate. A good chunk of my reads were people who had only 0-5 previous comments, so backlog did not seem to be much of a factor.
|
|
![]() |
|
awinchester ![]() NYC Midnight Regular ![]() Joined: 19 Jan 2022 Status: Offline Points: 487 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I didn’t post my story last year, and probably won’t this year, but I spent my time in between the deadline and the results reading through the entries, top to bottom, and giving feedback. (I only made it about halfway through, though.)
I was just as surprised to receive many responses and messages asking for me to post my story so they could return the favor. If you have the time, you get back what you put in, and I learned a lot about short story writing by just reading others’ entries. These forums, if a bit antiquated, are such an added value for writers, so I would encourage others to read through as well, not just in your category or subject. There is some very impressive creativity out there!
|
|
![]() |
|
theinquisitor ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() Joined: 10 May 2020 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 3984 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That reminds me, I'm behind on my MF250 returns.
Interesting stuff, thank you. I suspect there's also a correlation between the quality of the feedback and how likely you are to get a return - I know I'm less inclined to reciprocate where it's a one-liner that doesn't even make it clear they've read my story, and is blatantly just fishing for return reads.
|
|
![]() |
|
nod1v1ng ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Jul 2016 Location: ChillybytheSea Status: Offline Points: 11124 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's very possible. For the experiment, I gave my typical reviews - meaning a few things I loved, and a couple things that I thought could use attention, with a final overall wrap up. Generally 2-3 paras, even for micros.
|
|
![]() |
|
FireHorse ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() Joined: 13 Jul 2020 Location: Sydney Status: Offline Points: 3055 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What an interesting and thought-provoking experiment.
Nod, I see you also commented in the 'Replying to Comments' thread. The discussion there made me wonder whether the default setting for 'notify me of replies to posts' has changed. I don't think I ever set up my profile to get notifications, but my default is that I get them. From the posts in that thread, the newer members didn't appear to have that by default. Could skew the results. If there was a change and depending on when it happened. However, it would have zero impact on the tone of return reads from comments you left. That's terrifying. I don't *think* I treat new and established forum members with different levels of respect. Some old hands I have interacted with before - either on the forums or in beta, and a few by private message. So these people I have a relationship with and that may change things, but it shouldn't change level of respect. Doesn't surprise me that you got more replies from the members who'd been here longer. Over time, I'd expect the ones who don't reply to drop off the forums more quickly - they are almost by definition less engaged - so that means the established members are on average more likely to reply. As for how I choose reads, it's one or all of the following, in more or less descending order. - group mates. Hell yeah, I wanna check out the competition! Just as importantly, I love seeing how other people interpreted exactly the same prompts. - anyone who comments on my piece in that contest and round. The goal is to reciprocate with everyone. Isn't that just polite??? - people whose previous writing I have read and enjoyed. - interesting titles which catch my eye as I scroll down the Master List - people who are the only one of their group in the forums. At least as far as the master list shows. I feel they might need some TLC since it's lonely when you're the only one. - people in groups with same genre I had, or with really intriguing prompts. (Curiosity as to how other have handled those prompts...) - people whose stories are on page one of the contest subforum when I have done all the above and still want to read more. (This one means if other people comment I might be more likely to see them, but at times the front page changes so fast that's irrelevant!) When I spot newbies / others whose stories are not on the master list or who don't have a link in their signature, I often suggest those options to increase their visibility. Note that on mobile I can't see signatures, so it doesn't always happen. Like all of us I am human and don't always manage to live up to the standards I preach, but that overall 53% return read rate is far lower than I expected. A bit sad, really. *** Thanks for doing the experiment, and thanks for sharing too. |
|
![]() |
|
JanetM ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 2017 Location: Ontario Status: Offline Points: 2514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very interesting experiment! Thanks for doing it and sharing.
It's funny about the "new person = new writer" part. I wonder if that is part of all internet message boards where there are regulars. The sharing of personal art amplifies it. "You're new and and don't know how things are done around here" as a subconscious feeling. Then add a new person offering feedback. I start off strong with feedback. Then I get behind, but try to finish eventually. There are people who never return reads, for sure. I assume the worst and move on. ![]() I feel like I've gotten "better" at giving feedback after being here awhile now (thank you NYC Midnight) and via my writing critique group, but I do think it's a tricky thing and it's hard to know how your comments are received. Even when you think you've been positive and fair. (Sorry if I've ever offended anyone.) Just this last round I was mentioning some beta feedback to my daughter and she got offended on my behalf. ![]() Edited by JanetM - 30 Jan 2023 at 11:15am |
|
![]() |
|
hungrywriter ![]() NYC Midnight Addict ![]() Joined: 22 Jan 2022 Status: Offline Points: 674 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting! especially re: condescending tone to newbies. I wonder what made you feel patronized on the newbie accounts- since you are very published/established, some advice that might feel condescending to you may not be read the same for a user truly finding their bearings in fiction. If someone mentioned they were new or it was their first time entering, I would probably be more encouraging about their work and gentler when pointing out crits, while trying to highlight their strengths. I could see someone established rolling their eyes at that or viewing it as pandering stuff they already know, when for a newcomer it can be essential encouragement.
Of course, there's a difference between knowing someone is new at writing and just guessing based on their profile. Which is what makes your findings so interesting!
And that being said, I know the patronizing does happen... I remember feeling a bit bummed my first contest by some comments that felt overly blunt or backhanded. (Rarely were those comments given by someone who seemed to be established on the forum.) Over time those comments have affected me less as "I'm a terrible writer" and more as "this component didn't come across/won't land for some readers." But it did take a bit for me to learn. Just some thoughts! I bet it was kind of fun to go undercover like this. Thanks for sharing the results!
Edited by hungrywriter - 30 Jan 2023 at 10:49am |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 9> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |