Need Advice |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
SLK43
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 30 Jan 2017 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3803 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Posted: 14 Sep 2017 at 9:25pm |
|
I've decided I don't enter the competitions to get the judges feedback or the score. I agree with all previous comments re the contradictory opinions offered by judges. I enter them because this forum is priceless. Thank you for making it worthwhile regardless of outcome!
|
||
Lookit There
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 20 Feb 2014 Location: Portland, OR Status: Offline Points: 3920 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
If we knew what the judges were looking for, this contest would be a massive tie for 1st Place - 15s all around! That said, you can't write for the judges. I did that last year (political satire) and got a big fat zero. One of the judges' critique made me so furious that during the next round I thought, screw it, and wrote totally for myself. Got a 15!
WRITE FOR YOURSELF.
|
||
FFC1 12 Gay-ngry Men
|
||
Suave
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 25 Jan 2015 Location: Thailand Status: Offline Points: 25027 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
In my reading of others stories, specific to genre, it is plain that the judges do not follow the rules listed for the judging. I have read stories that really did not qualify as the genre score well, stories that did not have much meat, as far as a story, score well. I believe that the judges think they are cats. That said, if they told us how a story scored using the percentages they list in the rules, and included that with our feedback, it would make for a clearer understanding of what we needed to improve, instead of the useless feedback they give us now.
Edited by Suave - 14 Sep 2017 at 9:03pm |
||
lisafox10800
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 18 Jul 2016 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 9440 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
THIS^^ - always this. I had a very similar experience in the short story comp where I had COMPLETELY contradictory judge feedback. And it's frustrating. But every judge is human. Every judge is different. And like Forest Gump said, it's like a box of chocolates- you never know what you're going to get. Write something that YOU feel good about. And be happy you got points. You stand a fighting chance to move on.
|
||
lisafoxiswriting.com
My short story collection, Core Truths, is now available wherever books are sold. |
||
cheezopath
NYC Midnight Addict Joined: 25 Jan 2015 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 1138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
couple things:
- i have gone through to r3 with a r1 of 4 points before, it's definitely possible. - beyond the feedback comments it can be helpful to look at the specific marking criteria and ask yourself how you would score yourself on each. When I realised I was making good plots but not putting enough into character development, my success rate went up. -As long as you tick the boxes of of the prompt, you can forget about it and really work on the marking criteria. A story with really good writing that technically is in genre, has a secondary prompt character and passing reference to the object will do better than an average written story with obsessive adherence to genre, prompt character as the main focus and a deeply integrated object |
||
nod1v1ng
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 26 Jul 2016 Location: ChillybytheSea Status: Offline Points: 12497 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
I would have to echo this sentiment. Trying to figure out what the judges "want" will make you crazy. Case in point. My feedback for my third round FF story last year went a little like this: Judge 1: Your story was exceptionally successful because of Device A. Judge 2: The use of Device A was a disservice to your story. The. Same. Dang. Thing. Best advice - do you. Write the story you want. That's where your best writing is going to come from anyways.
|
||
MegOverman
NYC Midnight Addict Joined: 20 Jul 2014 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 1439 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
|
|
I maybe had to check to see if you were in my group. My use of the location was a little loose this time. Mentioned several times, story moved around, but it was never REALLY at a location that wasn't a mansion...per se. >.>
I play a pretty constant game of chicken with the judges on the object, but I'm USUALLY safer about the location. Unless I can make it a play on the location (pawn shop = place where chess pieces are carved, etc.), in which case I throw all caution to the wind. This is how I IMAGINE it goes: If there's no serious tie to any location in the story, and the prompt location is the one mentioned in passing, I imagine it gets a "no points deducted" from most (can never be sure) judges. I'd guess you don't get any extra for plunking it very concretely in the location if the location doesn't hold meaning for the story. But I always TELL MYSELF if the location can play in brilliantly somehow, that's better than a solid yet meaningless connection. So like: No use - negative points Minor mention, not clearly ignoring - full points Literal and full use, doesn't super affect the story - full points Cleverly used so story could only take place at that location - possible bonus Snarky use - negative, full, or bonus...depending on execution and judges. Who knows, in the end. 0.0
|
||
plkphoto
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 14 Jan 2015 Location: AliceSprings OZ Status: Offline Points: 3153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
SSC story lengths are: 1st round = 2500 words; 2nd round = 2000 words; and 3rd round = 1500 words.
|
||
MattrickBT
NYC Midnight Addict Joined: 15 Jul 2017 Location: Oshawa Status: Offline Points: 1270 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm not sure the length of the stories in the SSC (I imagine they're longer), but I imagine they're more lose with Flash Fiction requirements in terms of content due to the story length, whereas with a short story writers have more room to move within stricter confines.
|
||
plkphoto
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 14 Jan 2015 Location: AliceSprings OZ Status: Offline Points: 3153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I should also point out that the rules for SSC, regarding the importance of the character and subject they give, are worded very differently to the way they word the rules for FFC...
In SSC: "The assigned subject must be integral to the plot of the story. The assigned character must
be a relevant character used in the story." So "integral" and "relevant" rather than "predominant" and "included"...
Edited by plkphoto - 14 Sep 2017 at 4:49am |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |