NYC Midnight : Creative Writing & Screenwriting Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Creative Writing Corner
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Style, tone, pacing, telling, expericial
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Style, tone, pacing, telling, expericial

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
adam View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Regular
NYC Midnight Regular
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Location: ny
Status: Offline
Points: 138
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Style, tone, pacing, telling, expericial
    Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 10:35pm
Hi all, in taking in the feed back from the short story challenge, and really struggling to rewrite, I have come up against a bit of a hurdle on style. For me I am looking at tone, pacing, experiential writing vs telling, narrative voice. I wanted to open this up to see what others thought as well. I find books on writing really gloss over style (I think because it is so subjective or because they feel it will develop out of learning other techniques). 

I feel like sentence length and type should change with the pacing. My primary focus is to make the reader experience what the charter is experiencing. I strive to create a world and a moment in that world for the reader to have. I use a variety of techniques to accomplish this goal.  As pointed out in the review of my story, my use of too many can leave a disjointed feeling.
These are some of the aspects to style I was thinking of:

1) Formal vs informal in the voice (both character and narrator)
2) Colloquialisms with verbose colorful flare VS grounded concrete real life images.
3) telling vs showing (experiential) writing.
4) active vs passive voice
5) direct description vs Metaphoric description 
6) Pace from action vs pace from sentence structure.

That is about all I could think of with style please fell free to add in others.
So, my real question is how okay is it to vary these things within a piece.  Novel, Short story, Script? I believe in breaking every rule of writing (for me) so long as I have mastery of the rule first.

I have noticed for example, a large number of novels start each chapter very telly. this moves time fast gives a general feel and a ready set go (in my observation) but within one page we are into experiential writing (showing) with very little telling.

I am really lost with this in a short, because with a word count, if I am stuck I move it with telly phrases. But, I think there must be some form of a formula here.

Was curious what others thought.
Everyone is welcomed to join in.
Thanks
Adam
Sugar heat2/ Addiction
Blessed are those who offer gratitude and good will easily and receive it graciously.
Back to Top
sutekh137 View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Black Belt
NYC Midnight Black Belt


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2617
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sutekh137 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 12:14am
Originally posted by adam adam wrote:



1) Formal vs informal in the voice (both character and narrator)
2) Colloquialisms with verbose colorful flare VS grounded concrete real life images.
3) telling vs showing (experiential) writing.
4) active vs passive voice
5) direct description vs Metaphoric description 
6) Pace from action vs pace from sentence structure.



I think your list is exactly the right size while being entirely too long (or maybe it just can never cover everything?)

The point of the short is more journalistic than the things you appear to be near-agonizing over. Not crap J, good J.

The prescription is simple. Read a lot of short stories. See how they do it.  When I was in seventh grade, I bought a book, you know, from those little pulp-printed Scholastic lists, I'd just go for bang-for-buck. When I saw, "100 Short Short Science Fiction Stories" for $1.75, I was like, oh yeah. You kidding me? That's 1.75 cents per story, a literal deal on on the figurative "my two cents" (and I was a math geek).

One of the stories I'll never forget was entitled "Science Fiction For Telepaths".  It read:

Aw, you know what I mean.

That's the short end of the short word count. The punchline. Then there's the vignette, the story that isn't really a story because it's just a scene. It doesn't matter how exquisitely that scene is described -- you need plot. That gets you to a real story. Beginning, middle, end. Luckily, you don't have to go far to find good samples -- we all read them in high school (if not before).  Faulkner, Hemingway, O'Connor, Carver. Check out a couple anthologies from the library and you're all set.

The key is to lead with the critique -- to learn.  Yeah, it's OK to critique the greats.  It's OK not to like them. But you'll learn something. You can't not.  I'm not putting down anyone here, and there's plenty of material in these parts, but read some greats. Learn the shorts: plot, characters, dialogue, irony, etc.

And then write.

Write a memory. Write a shopping list. Write the first idea that pops into your head. Write a great idea, and then write a sh*tty idea but finish it. Every writer I have ever respected, when asked, says one thing in common: "When you write something, finish it." That's because that's how you learn, and if you're doing anything less, you're writing schlock -- punchlines and impersonal vignettes. You'll feel forever disconnected because you'll be thinking there's a magical formula out there.  There isn't.

To put it all another way, stop trying so hard.  *smile*  Like any other problem, face it with staid pragmatism and method: read other works, try yourself, find good readers who help you out, lather, rinse, repeat.

That's my advice, from an author who's never published a thing and probably never will (and who doesn't think it's necessarily important to do so).  If you can't trust me, who can you?  *grin*

Thanks,
JoeK
==============================================
Slow down. In attempting to do everything at once, you're missing it all.
==============================================
Back to Top
Gregonar View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Addict
NYC Midnight Addict
Avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver
Status: Offline
Points: 868
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gregonar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 1:08am
Form should reflect content---- pretty much sums up the stylistic choices of any artistic endeavor. Although elevated form with no content is often popular - hence "pop culture". 

I think the list of dichotomies you've set up is misleading. The most important thing for me is always knowing what exactly I'm trying to convey, and the choice of language should follow suit. For example, for 1) Formal vs informal: stories have generally always been informal. Even the narrator is a real person (though not necessarily one of the characters) and real people rarely think in formal language. The only times you'd write formal are in business or academic situations.  

The other thing to consider is consistency. Most stories have only one voice, occasionally there's two, but rarely more. Each voice should be consistent, except maybe at times when the plot thickens or when emotions run high. Even so, the voice is still consistent with the projected emotions of that character. So who is the narrator? (You are). So do you shift voices when you speak? (Not usually). In a different medium, many filmmakers will tell you that the camera is in fact a character, regardless of whether it's clear whose POV it's from. According, that "character" will dictate the style you write in, or the angle from which you'd shoot a scene in a movie. 

Anyway, that's my buck-seventy-five.  
Back to Top
adam View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Regular
NYC Midnight Regular
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Location: ny
Status: Offline
Points: 138
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 1:13am
Hey Joek, I definitely hear what you are saying and no doubt, writers write. And read. That is essential. But, I do believe the craft can be taken apart, and tools sharpened. I would like to make an analogy with football.

A football player, has to play the game. When you really want to improve though, you do not just play. You run drills, hit the gym, watch films of yourself and others.

I think of writing the same way. Reading is critical, second only to writing (including editing because writing is re-writing) But it is the techniques and the philosophical approach to those aspects that I was kind of hopping to spark a heat of ingenuity and exploration. 

The best writing is the natural kind, I just think it takes years of study and to make it natural.

One exercise  I thought of was writing a simple scene.  Then, taking the scene and changing the voice. Changing the tone from formal to informal. Sentence style from long and drawn out to short and staccato and look at the resulted effect. all the things listed above.

I also thought of a second exercise  in terms of character. Take two completely opposing styles of dialog and give them a reason to be in one room speaking through various characters. for example, a college professor, being tied up and robbed by a tug only latter to have the thug in his office asking for a job. That kind of stuff could leave lots of room for playing with speech patterns and done from multiple angles.

I was wondering if others had things they felt or learned about these elements they wished to share, or writing Prompts/exercises. It is good sometimes to bounce stuff off others. Or go through some things techniques like that writing prompts and give each other feed back. Sort of throwing it up and out there in a hail Mary hoping for a touchdown. (just to round off the analogy)

As always though man, I love to hear what you have to say. So, duly noted on the reading thing, and a good way to find my personal style is to find other styles I like and ones I do not.
Thanks for joining in
Adam  
 
Sugar heat2/ Addiction
Blessed are those who offer gratitude and good will easily and receive it graciously.
Back to Top
adam View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Regular
NYC Midnight Regular
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Location: ny
Status: Offline
Points: 138
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 1:24am
Gregonar, you make an excellent point. I would like to add one thing about the formal vs informal thing in literature, particularly short fiction. Sometimes with flash back, it is initiated in a more formal tone to make the distinction. I forgot the book I first read this in, and that author said it much more eloquently than I am. If you look for it, you may notice it.  Also, sometimes the voice (tone) can shift, to add different colorings, I think, and flavors to certain scenes. The thing is to pull this off, you really have to be such a master. But you are correct, about form and function. Well made point. Script writing makes it the most obvious and dramatic. I love what you said about that, because a well written script has the camera angles and action as its own character, with its own voice. The scripts for Rocky really drove that home on me. I digress. Well made point.    
Sugar heat2/ Addiction
Blessed are those who offer gratitude and good will easily and receive it graciously.
Back to Top
sutekh137 View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Black Belt
NYC Midnight Black Belt


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2617
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sutekh137 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 10:55am
I think the idea of "running drills" is a good one.  And for your scene-writing idea, you can work the technical details as well as the stylistic ones: change verb tense, change POV, use dialogue, don't use dialogue, etc. If nothing else, that makes some of the basic skills so reflexive that when it is time for writing you can concentrate on plot, character development, etc. In keeping with the football analogy, a successful player is probably going to have good muscle tone and stamina as a given before he/she starts tweaking the finer points of play making.

To this end, I would also suggest writing workshops ranging from a free, informal ones to higher-end, more symposium based stuff. I'm not the right guy to ask on that, but several folks around here have tried various things on that front.

JoeK
==============================================
Slow down. In attempting to do everything at once, you're missing it all.
==============================================
Back to Top
adam View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Regular
NYC Midnight Regular
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Location: ny
Status: Offline
Points: 138
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 11:36am
Great point Joek. Looking at those additional suggestions, I suppose they could be considered style also. Probably why the topic is such a complex one. We have not even got to the idea of making writing contrived or natural.
Sugar heat2/ Addiction
Blessed are those who offer gratitude and good will easily and receive it graciously.
Back to Top
Trillian4210 View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Black Belt
NYC Midnight Black Belt


Joined: 26 Sep 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2481
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Trillian4210 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 2:15pm
Originally posted by sutekh137 sutekh137 wrote:


One of the stories I'll never forget was entitled "Science Fiction For Telepaths".  It read:

Aw, you know what I mean.

LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL  That is awesome.
Back to Top
Scarlet Screenwriter View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Black Belt
NYC Midnight Black Belt
Avatar

Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Location: Castlemaine, OZ
Status: Offline
Points: 4682
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scarlet Screenwriter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 4:41pm

Exposition (telling) is the cardinal sin of screenwriters, so I really enjoy it when I am able to take that shortcut, as it were, to set the scene.

A film script can only include what the audience (and the reader) can see or hear. No "Telly." The clever screenwriter can colour how things are seen or said, but otherwise, anything else is exposition.




They seek him here, they seek him there, those damned writers seek him everywhere.
Is he in heaven or is he in hell, that damned elusive Scarlet Screenwriter! (Oh, phuck, that doesn't even rhyme!)
Back to Top
sutekh137 View Drop Down
NYC Midnight Black Belt
NYC Midnight Black Belt


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2617
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sutekh137 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 5:12pm
Originally posted by Trillian4210 Trillian4210 wrote:

Originally posted by sutekh137 sutekh137 wrote:


One of the stories I'll never forget was entitled "Science Fiction For Telepaths".  It read:

Aw, you know what I mean.

LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL  That is awesome.


The other one (even shorter) was titled "Sign At the End of the Universe".

It was only three words long, but I can't do the formatting here, so I will include it as an image:



(I should probably stop posting entire stories now, or at least go find the authors!)

Thanks,
JoeK
==============================================
Slow down. In attempting to do everything at once, you're missing it all.
==============================================
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.