![]() |
ChatGPT |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 14> |
Author | |||
Pages ![]() NYC Midnight Addict ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2021 Location: Edmonton Status: Offline Points: 669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I read that Sudowrite and possibly ChatGPT have been skimming the biggest database of free stories out there: Archive of Our Own, or AO3. This is primarily a fanfiction website. People post their stories for free, so no copyright issues, but it's weird to know that a story you (fine....I) wrote is being used to train an AI on how to write a story.
ChatGPT is confident - more so than Google. But confidence isn't truth. If you ask ChatGPT a question, it'll give an answer even if the answer is wrong. Also, once you've had the AI write a story for you, re-prompt it with "write this like a human would write it". You may get better results. |
|||
![]() |
|||
copperdogma ![]() NYC Midnight Groupie ![]() Joined: 16 May 2021 Status: Offline Points: 177 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I think that trust will be at the crux of it's acceptance and usefulness. Maybe each result could come with a confidence score, and clicking it would explain why it's confident (or not). Transparency and communication usually build the most trust. |
|||
![]() |
|||
taaaylor ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jul 2018 Location: Idaho Status: Offline Points: 5343 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
This fills me with a total and blind rage. I write online (reddit) and am at significant risk of being stolen from, too. I'm tempted to type in a keyword of my serial that only shows up in my serial, because it will be a dead giveaway if I've been plagiarized but I don't want to give those a-holes my phone number. To me it's especially soulless to steal from fanfic writers, given the potluck nature of the community and the legal gray area of asserting copyright. So f**ked. It rots the entire ecosystem of sharing stories with fellow fans. Thanks for mentioning this, as I'm out of my fanfic days and had no idea.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
taaaylor ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jul 2018 Location: Idaho Status: Offline Points: 5343 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
But that's still inaccurate. It's used for more precision, not less. It's not even why it was historically invented. It took me two google searches to discern that. Seriously, you should be more critical of what you read from a bot like that. It's still in training, and if you correct it, it will apologize for its mistake and adapt its statement to the new information you gave it. Here, now we all can learn about self-raising flour lolol: https://cotswoldflour.com/blogs/news/what-is-self-raising-flour-and-when-should-you-use-it Here's some advice: test it on something you actually know A LOT about. It's much easier to see the holes in its communication then.
Edited by taaaylor - 17 Jan 2023 at 4:05pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Pages ![]() NYC Midnight Addict ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2021 Location: Edmonton Status: Offline Points: 669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The bot shouldn't plagiarize your stories, but it will use the meat of them for creating a story, dialogue, and/or structure. As an example, it knows how to add a twist. How does it know that? By understanding what a twist is and how it relates to the bulk of the text presented. It 'reads' the story and understands that clues can be dropped that might indicate a twist later. It's not great at doing this, it's still in training. By 'meat' I mean: on AO3 there's a lot of stories about the Omegaverse. The AI has scraped all these stories and understands the basic concepts of them (Alphas are in charge, Omegas are subservient, Betas are neutral) and can plug these elements into a story. To be abundantly clear here, I don't support AI-written stories, but I think it's too late to stop it. Now it's a matter of what we do with the information, how it's integrated into our society, and how painful that integration will be in the short-to-medium term. I feel like the AI is taking away something intrinsic to humanity (creativity) and making a bid to eliminate humans' need to participate in this creativity. Machines were supposed to do the menial work for us so we'd have more time to create, instead AI is learning to be creative (by scrubbing art and writing sites) so humans can do the menial work (which corporations find cheaper than buying machines. To them, workers are expendable and cheap if there's no healthcare or salary expectations). Some companies are also looking into how to watermark AI-written pieces. If this gets some footing, then it'll be easier for judges to pick out AI-written work in challenges like NYCM's.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
taaaylor ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jul 2018 Location: Idaho Status: Offline Points: 5343 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yes, this is absolutely true and I totally agree. It's important clarification too, so thank you. By plagiarism, I mean copying syntax, imagery, language structure, thematic concepts, etc. as a function of its machine-learning. We will definitely need a different word for this kind of IP-infringement
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Pages ![]() NYC Midnight Addict ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2021 Location: Edmonton Status: Offline Points: 669 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yeah, it's likely learning all those things, but they're harder to learn than size-colour-item (big red ball, not red big ball) or whether an adverb is needed (smiled happily vs smiled sadly). The AI now has trillions of parameters, which is astonishing, so I suspect it'll learn these things uncomfortably fast. One would hope that as it learns it develops it's own style, just like humans do when we read novels when we aren't writing. When we sit down to write it's likely that the author's style will leak into ours, but the more we write the more we develop an individualized narrative style. |
|||
![]() |
|||
copperdogma ![]() NYC Midnight Groupie ![]() Joined: 16 May 2021 Status: Offline Points: 177 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Wow, thanks for sharing that. What a beautiful, heartfelt response he wrote. I'm in awe. If there's a silver lining to ChatGPT, it's caused a bunch of artists to deeply reflect on what they create, why they create it, and what it means to them and the world. I've been thinking about this a lot as a (wannabe) writer.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Suave ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() Joined: 25 Jan 2015 Location: Thailand Status: Offline Points: 23071 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Watermarks only work if you copy and paste. Now if there were a way of inserting certain words in a pattern throughout a story, sort of like the US dollar has the Eurion Constellation that a photocopy machine will not copy....
|
|||
![]() |
|||
copperdogma ![]() NYC Midnight Groupie ![]() Joined: 16 May 2021 Status: Offline Points: 177 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
We covered that earlier in the thread, but I'll paste it here: https://theamericangenius.com/tech-news/chatgpt-watermark/#:~:text=You%20can't%20currently%20use,stage%20of%20ChatGPT%20feature%20rollouts. TLDR: Cryptogenic watermarking. "The key to making AI content watermarking virtually undetectable is ensuring the distribution of words still has a unique and random appearance like regular AI-generated text." That's interesting. If they do it consistently enough within the text, anything you don't rewrite fully by hand would still contain that distribution ("watermark"), so the more you leave unchanged the higher it would rate on something detecting generated text. |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 14> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |