![]() |
ChatGPT |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456 14> |
Author | |||
Suave ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() Joined: 25 Jan 2015 Location: Thailand Status: Offline Points: 23071 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Haha, that is hilarious!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Popsicle Crows ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 2021 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2405 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
OMG, it kicked a puppy. The ultimate bad guy move. ![]() Can you ask it if it can self-destruct? And again, Trey's story '177 Seconds' wins. |
|||
![]() |
|||
copperdogma ![]() NYC Midnight Groupie ![]() Joined: 16 May 2021 Status: Offline Points: 177 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
My wife is a university prof and I've stressed her out by telling her about ChatGTP. She's now worried her students will be using it to cheat.
She did some research and found this ChatGTP detector: https://openai-openai-detector.hf.space/ I tried it on a dozen things that I wrote or I had it write, and it detected the generated stories 100% of the time. This article, though, says it's only about 66% accurate: https://www.zdnet.com/article/can-ai-detectors-save-us-from-chatgpt-i-tried-3-online-tools-to-find-out/ Which is still pretty good. The issue will be that AI and the way these models are trained are something of an arms race. Almost in a literal sense. One popular way of training them is antagonistic training. Basically you have two AIs, one generating content and the other checking that content and rating how close to the goal it is. All an AI company would have to do is use the ChatGPT detector as the antagonist in its training, which would cause it's generating AI to create more and more realistic writing until the detector was consistently rating the generated story as "100% human made." So the detector will be good for... Oh.. I'd guess a year, max?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Popsicle Crows ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 2021 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2405 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It looks like the creators of the program are going to put something similar to a watermark into it so people can't use it for cheating.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
laleighda ![]() NYC Midnight Regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Location: Florida Status: Offline Points: 425 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Thanks for posting that tool! Writing is one of the greatest skills a person can have and I try to promote it in my classes (I teach at a state college, criminal justice). I've gotten good at detecting when someone copies and pastes from a website, but am happy to have a tool that'll help detect AI.
Thanks again!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
copperdogma ![]() NYC Midnight Groupie ![]() Joined: 16 May 2021 Status: Offline Points: 177 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I heard about that! I'm a programmer by trade and I was having trouble imagining how they'd do that. This article has a good explainer: https://theamericangenius.com/tech-news/chatgpt-watermark/#:~:text=You%20can't%20currently%20use,stage%20of%20ChatGPT%20feature%20rollouts. TLDR: Cryptogenic watermarking. "The key to making AI content watermarking virtually undetectable is ensuring the distribution of words still has a unique and random appearance like regular AI-generated text." That's interesting. If they do it consistently enough within the text, anything you don't rewrite fully by hand would still contain that distribution ("watermark"), so the more you leave unchanged the higher it would rate on something detecting generated text. That actually sounds workable.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Popsicle Crows ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 2021 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2405 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It does! Fingers crossed that they make it happen. Sounds like they want to be successful creatives instead of the bad guys that pisses off people. Better for them to improve their own program and be the heroes.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Deschain ![]() NYC Midnight Regular ![]() ![]() Joined: 18 Nov 2022 Location: Baltimore, MD Status: Offline Points: 484 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It's upsetting whenever you read something that you feel emotionally invested in and then learn you were deceived by the author. I imagine this would feel the same as when you read something labeled as a memoir or autobiography and then learn the story was fabricated. However, if I know ahead of time that a story was generated by AI, and I enjoy it, then I guess I enjoy it.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
copperdogma ![]() NYC Midnight Groupie ![]() Joined: 16 May 2021 Status: Offline Points: 177 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I know what you mean. I've been applying that same question to other things. What if I knew a video game I loved was mostly created by AI? What about a washing machine? An instruction manual? A piece of furniture? The answer changes in strange and subtle ways with each thing. I feel like we're going to spend a LOT of time in the (near) future grappling with these questions on an ever-increasing cadence.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
taaaylor ![]() NYC Midnight Black Belt ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jul 2018 Location: Idaho Status: Offline Points: 5343 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I cannot agree with the fundamental premise that I would ever like something written by an AI. Particularly creative writing. Unlike art, there are NO objective ratios or formulae by which to measure if something is "right" in creative writing. And even then, the art AIs are still trash compared to a competent artist. It's highly telling that ChatGPT can only semi-succesfully reproduce nonfiction text or code. Nonfiction is consistent, if you write like a dry piece of cardboard. It has a formula that can be derived from millions of similar content articles online. Creative writing is fundamentally incomparable.
1) Of course I'm worried. Like many visual artists found after Midjourney AI went big, we are relying on the honor system of the people who built the bot and the people who trained it by uploading content. There are artists who never agreed to have their art included in the learning algorithm who have now been included. (I would not have used Midjourney if I knew that; I naively trusted their claim that all images it trained on were in the public domain.) I have 500k+ words available for free on my Reddit writing account. I have no doubt that my work will be stolen for this endeavor, to train robots to try to replace writers like me. However, I am not worried about being outwritten by a robot. I am worried about how to protect my IP in this era without damaging my readers or my own success. It will be extremely hard to share writing for free on indexable searches in the next 10 years. I've already had my writing stolen over and over by TikTok or Youtube narrators. This is just the next iteration of lazy art thieves. f**k them all. No respect. 2) As long as quantum computing is only a pipedream, ChatGPT will never be as good as a human creative writer who's been writing for more than about five minutes. Full stop. The simple technical limits of the algorithm + the infinite capacity of the human mind make it no-contest.
Edited by taaaylor - 15 Jan 2023 at 3:32pm |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456 14> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |