Round 2 SS Feedback Thread |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
SakuraHime
NYC Midnight Regular Joined: 29 Jan 2017 Location: Avondale, AZ Status: Offline Points: 340 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 May 2017 at 10:53am |
|
''Something in the Water'' by Krystina Whitten - WHAT THE JUDGES LIKED ABOUT YOUR STORY -
{1812} The action at the beginning of the story caught my attention right away. The theme is interesting - tainted water that causes people to act like zombies - overall, a well developed premise with intriguing characters. {1689} I love how you build your story on the strong connection between Andrew and Ella. Great job showing the people being slightly off through your imagery and their actions. The message of the final note is spot on. {1743} This is a well-written short story whose fiction is more of a possibility than we care to know. The note at the end of the story is a welcome surprise, and it is a fine touch to tie the whole story together in only a few sentences. Congratulations to the author of this story for creating a fine piece of fiction. WHAT THE JUDGES FEEL NEEDS WORK - {1812} The ending lacks the authenticity of the rest of the story. It also raises questions that should be explained in the story. How did the woman manage to write a personal note to Ella, who hadn't introduced herself, and slip out the door without being seen? Why did she leave so mysteriously? The ending might work better if the woman simply told Ella about knowing her father and her need to leave again. If the woman had a safe water supply boiling on the stove, why was she "moaning" and "weak" when she had the strength to steal the water canteen from Ella and run away? Try to answer these questions and clear up the inconsistencies in the ending. I agree - this ending was thrown together after realizing my first one wasn't coming together the way I wanted it to. {1689} Though I love your bold choice to use a dual approach to tell your story, I’m not sure there’s enough time to do both. Try telling your story without the italicized sections. What do you notice? Does it make the story more immediate? Raise the stakes? If not, try putting all the information in italics together at the top. Does that make the rest of what happens easier to follow? I love this conflict over water—but I want to see the battle scene that brings the realization. I want to see the sacrifice that made that realization possible. I think you can bring those into your story if you focus on Ella’s relationship with her father or her father through the ranger. This is also pretty solid, the dual approach was a result of trying to correct the ending, so all of that was added after the original story was written and I scrapped my original ending. {1743} Probably better writing "anyway" than "anyways." Pull up the space in "what" between "know" and "wrong' on page 3. Cut "up" after "dreamed." Cut: "holy sh*t." Cut: "You bitch." Cut: "f**k." You don't need it. Fair, for the most part but seriously, the cursing during an intense and frightening situation makes sense to me, and was a way to express my MC's sense of stress and panic. Overall, the feedback is pretty positive when compared to my own feelings about my round 2 story, and I'm looking forward to attempting this again next year!
|
||
2019 FFC R1 Who Needs a Wall? (Gr: 35 – PoliSat/A Garbage Dump/A Grill)
|
||
De Chelonian Mobile
NYC Midnight Addict Joined: 28 Jan 2017 Location: Gordon GA Status: Offline Points: 655 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
< ="text/">
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 16.0px Arial; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000}
span.s1 {font-kerning: none}
''Mythical Beasts and Remarkably Bad Dogs'' by Jonathan Clark - WHAT THE JUDGES LIKED ABOUT YOUR STORY - {1795} You might be surprised to hear it, but this is the very first story in this heat that used the classic postman vs dog theme. Congrats! The premise is so incredibly simple, and kind of obvious, that one might expect at least part of this to feed into several other stories, but yours is almost wholly unique. {1569} Fritz was the quintessential tongue tied lovestruck protagonist and his relationship with Madison took center stage, not the realm of magic. The arc of their relationship was satisfying. The humor was gentle and the characters and dialog felt authentic. {1809} I like how you created prejudice between the dogs and postman. WHAT THE JUDGES FEEL NEEDS WORK - {1795} This will all seem a bit picky perhaps, but given the journalist who leaves once the dachshund ends up putting Fritz on his ass, and the fact that Madison mentions receiving bad press, I wonder if there shouldn't be some mention of the headline the journalist chose to use. Everything went swimmingly, other than the one incident. Which means unicorns, and hellhounds, and dragons all passed just fine. So that headline must have been brutal to really elicit bad press. Once you have a solid story like you have, finding those little details that really flesh it out, can make a huge difference. {1569} Fritz felt a little too weak. Perhaps some demonstration of ability or virtue to show why Madison was attracted to him might have helped. {1809} Try giving your readers an ending to Fritz and Madison. It seems like they have unresolved issues. Maybe Fritz can ask her out and she says yes. Remember that both characters should either reach the goal that they have or fail. |
||
plkphoto
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 14 Jan 2015 Location: AliceSprings OZ Status: Offline Points: 3153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
English teacher? I noticed that too. The syntax comment I got from 1743 was quite helpful, though, and very specific to my story. So, if they're going to comment on syntax every time, at least they're making it count and not just giving the same generic comment to everyone.
|
||
Tricksie
NYC Midnight Addict Joined: 20 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 1157 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Judge 1743 looooooves to comment on syntax. What's up with that? I think every feedback I've seen from them says something about syntax. (Including mine.)
|
||
R1 G109 PolSat Not Much Will Actually Change
|
||
Nate
Newbie Joined: 19 Sep 2016 Location: memphis Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ok, I didn't make the final round. After the initial disappointment, I had to agree with the Judges on most of their points. I drew SciFi.
I was able to sneak one by all of my Judges. None caught my obvious reference to Fredrich Nietzsche and his concept of Ubermensch and the theme in my story about Nihilism. Consider the following paragraph from my story.... Once the space wagon was loaded, I gave the command, “Let’s go.” We have to get out into the atmosphere to catch the interstellar teleporter to get to Earth.” I doubled checked that the home pod was locked up. The Mensch was ready to go. My name is Uber. Zarathustra, call her Zara, is my wife. We have two children Mini, the youngest and most imaginative of us and Freddie, who is a teenager and no need to say more about that was the last to climb aboard the Rambler. I hit the hyperspace button, and the launch countdown began, and we were now Earthbound. So put that in your pipe you nasty, old, overworked Judges! and thank you! |
||
fragmentedelle
Newbie Joined: 02 Feb 2017 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I haven't had mine yet, either. You aren't alone!
|
||
Imaginative Insanity
NYC Midnight Newbie Joined: 31 Jan 2017 Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Has anyone else not gotten their feedback yet?
I know I technically have 40 more minutes until it's late, it just seems like everyone else has gotten theirs, and it's making me paranoid. And yes, I've checked both 'promotions' (where NYCM stuff usually goes) and Spam. I'll wait until after the official deadline to email them, I was just wondering if anyone else was in the same boat. |
||
FFC 2017:
Ch1: Makeshift (Fantasy) |
||
plkphoto
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 14 Jan 2015 Location: AliceSprings OZ Status: Offline Points: 3153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I feel like I might have won the judge lottery this time around. I really like this feedback:
''The Secret of the Ibex'' (HM) WHAT THE JUDGES LIKED ABOUT YOUR STORY - {1809} I like how you built the tension of letting the readers know of Alberic's plan. I like how Dmitri followed the Ibex, it suggested that he is caring but also pays attention to nature. It's a good story that shows how people should would together to solve problems. {1569} The contrasts built into the story by using the uplanders and flatlanders were very good and clearly presented. The story functions as both fable and fairy tale. The ending was satisfying and presented the moral of the story in action rather than simply stating it in narration. The assigned elements were very cleverly used. {1743} Quite an inventive and imaginative fairy tale written as parable. it is ingeniously rendered. Fluidly written with a clarity of incisive dialog. This writing exhibits discipline and control in its telling of the tale--of conservation, ecology, and peace. WHAT THE JUDGES FEEL NEEDS WORK - {1809} Try making Alberic confront Dmitri and threatening the flatlanders. It would add more suspense to the readers as they read the tension that you have created. You should definitely keep the ending the same but it would allow your point to be clearer. {1569} The story was exposition heavy which slowed the opening down. Conflict wasn't presented and stakes weren't raised until half-way through the story, and bringing it in earlier might have worked better. {1743} Endings can often be a tad challenging even in a nearly masterful piece of writing. Syntax is often everything, quite frankly. Try inverting the last sentence ("Dmitri and Alberic . . . ") as the first in the ultimate paragraph; with the first sentence ("Slowly, the old man . . . ) now being the second, then ending with what was the second ("He bleated, and a small herd . . .). That may provide just a bit more resonance, as well as lyricism, for the conclusion. ---- Not only do I agree with my feedback, but most of it will actually be useful when I go to revise. YAY!
|
||
fistofcurry
NYC Midnight Groupie Joined: 13 Dec 2016 Location: SFSD Status: Offline Points: 226 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
''Pendleton
Crane and the Mystery of the Murdered Marathoner''
WHAT THE JUDGES LIKED ABOUT YOUR STORY {1733} Pendleton Crane is a great character, and the twist at the end was so fulfilling because of his wonderfully full setup. It really was a great end to a delightful, smartly-written romp. {1626} Fantastic introduction to Pendleton, nice action writing. I laughed at loud at this clever writing: “They say he’s smarter than Einstein and that wheelchair guy combined,” Tony gushed.” Strong visual, and hilarious: “It’s highly unnecessary,” replied Crane, tossing the bloodied end of his scarf over one shoulder. Loved this funny non-sequitur interruption: “I don’t see a racial angle o the crime.” Dylan getting on Crane’s level out of desperation was brilliant. Excellent comedic relief during the climax: “According to Dictionary.com, an armoire is defined as a wardrobe. . . or moveable cabinet.” Hilarious ending back and forth. {1651} Great logline; it pulls you in immediately. I laughed out loud at the joke ending with "And ain't nobody solved it yet." The way this author writes makes for a fun read. WHAT THE JUDGES FEEL NEEDS WORK {1733} There is a problem of the plotline because the audience will suspend their disbelief to follow Crane around - we all love Bones or similar larger-than-life detectives! - but when he fights reason with the other cop who is nearly sent away, that's when reason kicks in. It loses that graceful tension the audience has lent you to go along with the ride. You really need to find a way to finesse that transition a bit more so that it's not such a jolt of "wait, that would never happen." {1626} Not much room to improve, hilarious writing. The only thing I would change would be consider adding a third location or flashback to give the story more texture. {1651} The story falls apart when Mr. Crane's scarf falls into the pool of blood. Now we know he's a hack and the jig is up, but the story continues. It feels a bit unbelievable that the rest of the officers would continue to believe Crane at this point. If you can make Crane believable up until near the very end, you can continue to build the tension and raise the stakes, earning that ending. |
||
stephenmatlock
NYC Midnight Black Belt Joined: 05 Sep 2013 Location: Seattle Status: Offline Points: 10422 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't even know. AFAICT, judges are paid for their time, so I think they're giving their input, but mine felt like they had to find something to say in spots. And then the last one... Just don't have it in me right now to want to think about what they said. But - I thought your story was interesting and well-crafted and a unique piece of writing. |
||
Pithy sayings are for the apt. For a longer message, you need a condo.
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |